Wednesday, November 28, 2007

CLEVELAND, ARE YOU READY TO ROCK?



Yeah, that wookie was hell on the skins... The blog has fallen off the radar lately, but I had to meet the once-a-month criteria. I noticed that a lot of the spam I've been receiving at work lately employs some sort of random word generator in the subject line. I found some of it somewhat poetic, so I started collecting them. I guess it also beats the typical subject line, which is some sort of insult to my penis like "Sad little thing_ do sOmeTHing" or "HEy tEEny onE, gEt Rx"... what a way to start a business relationship... and how did I get on that mailing list anyway? Well here they are, and to add to the effect, read with that silly poetry voice that everyone gets when they have to read their poetry in class... and that some jerkoffs maintain well into grad school. You know the one, slow and soft, quivering a bit...


Ice-cream Gas Bible Sex Map
Microscope Satellite Gas Bed Chisel
Data Base Fire Crystal School Space Shuttle
Aeroplane Software Balloon Cave Apple
Sphere Mosquito Water Army Mist
Wheelchair Train Train Army Snail
Restaurant Videotape Chess Board Compact Disc Bee
Worm Saddle Navy Chocolates Chair
Rifle Swimming Pool Skeleton Leather jacket Girl
Airport Surveyor Button Tennis racquet Bowl
Onion Bee Record Army Insect
Bomb Television Comet Rocket Hieroglyph
Maze Swimming Pool Monster Junk Circus
Air Radar Bed Family Grapes
Bomb Television Comet Rocket Hieroglyph
Rock Garden Train Chisel Meat
Bomb Bed Brain Circus Signature
Restaurant Dung Backpack Spiral Car-race
Compact Disc Water Airforce Floodlight Bible
Bed Banana Boss Spiral Ring Data Base Vampire
Chocolates Sunglasses Monster Foot Drum Typewriter Navy
Flower Post-office Foot Drum Child
Room School Vulture Junk Chess Board

Please let me know your favorites. Also, if your trying to name your band, look no further. Just pick 2 or 3 words from any line and your in business. In fact, I'm practicing with Vulture Junk tonight (unless we settle on Dung Spiral Car-race).

And now, a public service announcement:

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Looking for a new political party?

Tired of the evil, lying Republicans?




Sick of the spineless, corporatist Democrats?



Try The Elder Party!

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Bird Can Move!

Okay, I hardly ever post, and when I do, it is usually dry political clips from youtube. So, I give you a dancing bird...

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

More on this big f$ckin' (disaster) lie

Okay, while I'm on an Iraq roll, here is a pretty powerful montage...



The saddest part is that I think it was all done to fill the pockets of the folks in charge, and even more so, the people who own them...
so much for the American experiment?
Just in case you thought that was a selected snippet of the Cheney clip in the last post, here is another, even earlier (1992) speaking engagement that shows that he had it well rehearsed this answer (so it was not off the cuff):



And here is a clip that includes the aforementioned clip from the last post that also shows how he behaved after he was called out by the press (although lightly by the mainstream press):



I know this is dry stuff (CHENEY), but, shit, how can anyone buy these assholes' crap at this point? I'm losing faith in my countrymen...

Friday, September 28, 2007

The penguin speaks...



This is a speech given in 1994 when Cheney was the Secretary of Defense explaining why they didn't go after Saddam Hussein... Every dipshit who still supports starting this war should be placed in the A Clockwork Orange contraption and forced to watch this video repeatedly for days on end...

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Food Review


Enjoy this food review... I can't imagine this product not being good... and who knew that prepared cups of salmon could be caught in the wild? Other products with the same rating are here... yum

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Armageddon begins?



Go read this compelling piece making the case that we are on the verge of a massive attack on Iran. I'd like to think that noone would be stupid enough to do this, but then again, look at our leaders. Plus, they'll all get rich and stick us with the bloody bill...


God help us all:




Friday, August 17, 2007

Heil Kitler!





No time for a real post, so check out these historic kitties...

Thursday, August 2, 2007

More on Academic Freedom...Schmreedom



One of the most annoying things in contemporary politics is the ease with which criticism of Israeli policies can be confounded with antisemitism. If you are a reasonable person who doesn't buy into any of the global jewish conspiracy crap, but vocally disagree with actions taken by the Israeli government, some asshole like Alan Dershowitz can wave a magic wand and you are now a hater of Jews. Boy, that's the way to foster debate... Well, in a follow up to my last post, here is another case that appears to smack of this shit. It looks to me like Mr. Finkelstein (yes, now even Jews who criticize Israel are called antisemitic) was canned for his political beliefs...







Well, here it is, my chance to be labeled something I'm not. I think Isreal does plenty of fucked up shit (most of which is done with the help of the good ol' US of A), and no one in the US is safe from censure if they openly question it. Most of all, professors, who are our paid thinkers, cannot safely consider both sides of any debate about Isreal without fear of losing their jobs. What a free country we live in...
Sad thing is, I used to admire Dershowitz. I used to enjoy him coming on political shows and slicing and dicing up dipshits like Ann Coulter (who I saw refer to Alexander Hamilton as a President during one of their exchanges... she's a man baby). I even enjoyed another asshole, Ron Silver, playing Dershowitz in a great movie called Reversal of Fortune. Now, though, he only sees things the way the backwards-thinking AIPAC sees them... no debate allowed....

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

"The World Must Learn That What We Say Goes..." or Academic Freedom?





You may have read about the firing of University of Colorado Prof Ward Churchill? Well, it is all because of this essay. They say it is about other stuff, but I've followed this story for awhile, and I suspect that had he never wrote this essay, he would be continuing to build his retirement nest egg and pissing off rich kids in gen ed classes. Once again, do read the essay (here or here , or if you really want to get audited, buy his book here).

So, since when is it strange for an academic to point out the wars and disparity that result from globalism and capitalism? Whether you agree with the "radical leftist" views from many profs or not, this sort of firing should creep you out. The deck is already pretty stacked against any of these lefty messages even taking serious root, so why is it so scary to the establishment? I thought part of college was to expand your views, and most of us have had those few radical and/or screwball and/or brilliant profs that espouse stuff that blows away your reality. That is a vital part of getting something out of college. I read the essay, and I guess I've been enured to lefty stuff (and agree with plenty of it), because it didn't seem that shocking to me. The basic premise? If you go out and try to tell everyone what to do, and while doing so, you enact policies that hurt and kill many people, people will end up resenting and hating you... Churchill quotes Bush the Elder when he says "The world must learn that what we say goes..." which was also in the title of a Chomsky book and this essay. Remember, no one likes a bully, especially one that pitches like a girly girl...


Tuesday, July 10, 2007

The Great Golden Digger

Okay, a break from the politics... When my good friends Steve and Kerry were visiting, we were all intrigued by this totally groovey (groovy?) bug that was occupying a small hole dug in the dirt beneath the overhang of the Ho Hum House. I was battling a carpenter ant issue (they were nesting in the logs propping up a flower bed) and wondered if the expensive evil poison I left for them had sent the queen flying... yes, this bug was that wierd and big, and since I've never seen a pissed off ant queen, I thought it might be her (and readily available for a easy demise). So, I went on line and with the help of my guests, we determined that this "bug"ger was most likely a Cicada Killer Wasp (YEAH!!!), but I dare say, my wasp is much more handsome than most of the pics of CKWs I found on line (but perhaps I'm a bit biased). This wasp is not only pertty, but it has a very cool movement, reminding me of some of the little stick insect creatures from Pan's Labyrinth. The color scheme for the CKW was just not right, though, and with some further searching, I determined it was a Great Golden Digger Wasp. Yes, no doubt now. And I even confirmed that they are in Iowa.



Here are some sights with pics of the GDW... click here and here and, after looking at my pics below, tell me if you agree... in fact, we saw this wasp with a green bug just like this scene, and the wasp dragged it into it's cave (no doubt to fill it full of eggs... yum!). And if you haven't had enough, go see my entry at dave's garden.

Here are some pics I took. Pardon the fuzziness, because I'm nervous around wasps, and the overhang of the house kills light... I'd estimate the size to be between an inch and an inch and a half from noggin to ass (pardon the technical jargon).














The GOOD, the fat, and the ugly

Howdy to the teeming millions of ho hummers out there... my laziness with the with the blog is only abated by the many ringlets that comprise my sporty bouffant. What did get me going, though, was hearing a clip from Wolf Blitzer (who, by the way, was a lobbyist for the evil AIPAC... conflict of interest? Hmmm...) being effectively and totally called out by Michael Moore for being part of the worthless and/or complicit corporate media. (do hit that "totally called out" link and watch it... witness a rare seem in the corporate stranglehold on our media being ripped out)

Have you noticed how Michael Moore is consistently marginalized by the media as a preface to any interview or anything said about him? Why? (Because he isn't the one lying...)



Look, I showed a pic of Michael Moore morphed with Fat Bastard... Do you see now? He's the evil one and Bush and the corporations are lookin' out for us...

Now for some real news, this gourd has a face on it... it is an Asian varietal (and quite tasty when my lady cooks it) so it must be Buddha...

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

This and that

Congrats!
Bummer about your job...
Sorry about the break up...

My buddy and exblogger Matt hipped me to these funny ecards… definitely worth a look


I found this blog whilst looking for news on Scooter Libby’s sentencing… doubt he will serve time, but its fun to think about a guy going to jail who already has a prison nickname… some think Rove or Cheney is next... life is probably not that fair.



I found this accurate photo at this blog


Monday, May 21, 2007


Thursday, May 10, 2007

Scary must-read interview





Okay, maybe I should say that he/she (yes, big brother is a tranny) is listening to you. Don't skip reading this one, as it is as creepy as it gets on this scale.
Here is some more big bro stuff, and that was found at this site, which is a site worthy of perusal...


Thursday, May 3, 2007


Man, my wife leaves for a few days and THIS is what happens...

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Only in Arkansas...

I think this is real (stupid), and the man (yes, Connie) is a lawyer... Wow!

Bring home the troops now!

Yo Ho Hummers, see the PSA below:

Watch VideoVets.org

Watch VideoVets.org

Friday, April 20, 2007

World Shocked That Wolfowitz Has Girlfriend



‘Who Would Date Wolfowitz?’ Millions Ask

Amid the controversy swirling about World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz, millions of people today reacted with shock to what is universally considered the most improbable aspect of the story: that Paul Wolfowitz could have a girlfriend. Read the rest here...
.
.

Thursday, April 19, 2007


Monday, April 9, 2007

Paul Krugman: Sweet Little Lies



Okay, this picture has nothing to do with the editorial below, but I'm hoping that it got your interest... so, do read this...it's not so boring and right on the nose.
Paul Krugman explains the power of the "Little Lie" (NY Times 4/9/07):
(I would link to the NY Times, but the aholes are no longer free)

Four years into a war fought to eliminate a nonexistent threat, we all have renewed appreciation for the power of the Big Lie: people tend to believe false official claims about big issues, because they can’t picture their leaders being dishonest about such things.

But there’s another political lesson I don’t think has sunk in: the power of the Little Lie — the small accusation invented out of thin air, followed by another, and another, and another. Little Lies aren’t meant to have staying power. Instead, they create a sort of background hum, a sense that the person facing all these accusations must have done something wrong.

For a long time, basically from 9/11 until the last remnants of President Bush’s credibility drowned in New Orleans, the Bush administration was able to go big on its deceptions. Most people found it inconceivable that an American president would, for example, assert without evidence that Saddam and Al Qaeda were allies. Mr. Bush won the 2004 election because a quorum of voters still couldn’t believe he would grossly mislead them on matters of national security.

Before 9/11, however, the right-wing noise machine mainly relied on little lies. And now it has returned to its roots.

The Clinton years were a parade of fake scandals: Whitewater, Troopergate, Travelgate, Filegate, Christmas-card-gate. At the end, there were false claims that Clinton staff members trashed the White House on their way out.

Each pseudoscandal got headlines, air time and finger-wagging from the talking heads. The eventual discovery in each case that there was no there there, if reported at all, received far less attention. The effect was to make an administration that was, in fact, pretty honest and well run — especially compared with its successor — seem mired in scandal.

Even in the post-9/11 environment, little lies never went away. In particular, promoting little lies seems to have been one of the main things U.S. attorneys, as loyal Bushies, were expected to do. For example, David Iglesias, the U.S. Attorney in New Mexico, appears to have been fired because he wouldn’t bring unwarranted charges of voter fraud.

There’s a lot of talk now about a case in Wisconsin, where the Bush-appointed U.S. attorney prosecuted the state’s purchasing supervisor over charges that a court recently dismissed after just 26 minutes of oral testimony, with one judge calling the evidence “beyond thin.” But by then the accusations had done their job: the unjustly accused official had served almost four months in prison, and the case figured prominently in attack ads alleging corruption in the Democratic governor’s administration.

This is the context in which you need to see the wild swings Republicans have been taking at Nancy Pelosi.

First, there were claims that the speaker of the House had demanded a lavish plane for her trips back to California. One Republican leader denounced her “arrogance of extravagance” — then, when it became clear that the whole story was bogus, admitted that he had never had any evidence. Now there’s Ms. Pelosi’s fact-finding trip to Syria, which Dick Cheney denounced as “bad behavior” — unlike the visit to Syria by three Republican congressmen a few days earlier, or Newt Gingrich’s trip to China when he was speaker. Ms. Pelosi has responded coolly, dismissing the administration’s reaction as a “tantrum.” But it’s more than that: the hysterical reaction to her trip is part of a political strategy, aided and abetted by news organizations that give little lies their time in the sun.

Fox News, which is a partisan operation in all but name, plays a crucial role in the Little Lie strategy — which is why there is growing pressure on Democratic politicians not to do anything, like participating in Fox-hosted debates, that helps Fox impersonate a legitimate news organization.

But Fox has had plenty of help. Even Time’s Joe Klein, a media insider if anyone is, wrote of the Pelosi trip that “the media coverage of this on CNN and elsewhere has been abysmal.” For example, CNN ran a segment about Ms. Pelosi’s trip titled “Talking to Terrorists.”
The G.O.P.’s reversion to the Little Lie technique is a symptom of political weakness, of a party reduced to trivial smears because it has nothing else to offer. But the technique will remain effective — and the U.S. political scene will remain ugly — as long as many people in the news media keep playing along.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

A sitcom so simple that even a cheesy network producer could develop it...



Yes, in the whorish climate of network TV, the geniuses at ABC are developing a sitcom based on the GEICO cavemen... if you don't believe me, read this. Now, I have to admit to liking the caveman commercials (while hating all of the other GEICO commercials and most other commercials in general). While none of the successors have lived up to the "...mango salsa" classic, they are still funny and the actor is always brilliant. In fact, took enormous guilty pleasure snooping around the cavemen's apartment here (be sure to dress him). And, I will probably fall victim to at least one episode... though nothing can best the original modern caveman Cirroc... the late Phil Hartman's Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer. Enjoy this clip before the evil a-holes at SNL make them take it down...

Although this link will probably only work for awhile, this has to be one of the wierdest things I've ever seen on ebay... any thoughts?

Thursday, March 22, 2007


Check out these "dirty" comics from the past...

Larry "Bud" Melman 1921-2007


Wednesday, March 21, 2007

OH BLACKWATER...



Listen to this Fresh Aire interview about the rise of Bush's Praetorian Guard, Blackwater. This is really scary stuff. If you'd rather read, go here, but do check it out one way or another... their "helping out" after Katrina is especially creepy...

Onto impeachment...


If you have time, peruse the articles of impeachment against Nixon shown below that I borrowed from Eschaton... Gonzales can easily be impeached on these criteria... it'll be interesting to see how far this goes (we all know how far it should go)



The Nixon Articles of impeachment, which passed the House Judiciary Committee:
Article 1
RESOLVED, That Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:
ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST RICHARD M. NIXON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.
ARTICLE 1
In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:
On June 17, 1972, and prior thereto, agents of the Committee for the Re-election of the President committed unlawful entry of the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee in Washington, District of Columbia, for the purpose of securing political intelligence. Subsequent thereto, Richard M. Nixon, using the powers of his high office, engaged personally and through his close subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such illegal entry; to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible; and to conceal the existence and scope of other unlawful covert activities.
The means used to implement this course of conduct or plan included one or more of the following:
1. making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees;
5. approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.
In all of this, Richard M. Nixon has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
Wherefore Richard M. Nixon, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

Adopted 27-11 by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, at 7.07pm on Saturday, 27th July, 1974, in Room 2141 of the Rayburn Office Building, Washington D.C.
* Listen to the roll call of the Judiciary Committee on the First Article of Impeachment
* Listen to the Announcement of the Vote

Article 2
Using the powers of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the executive branch and the purposed of these agencies.
This conduct has included one or more of the following:
1. He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavoured to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, confidential information contained in income tax returns for purposed not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other income tax investigations to be intitiated or conducted in a discriminatory manner.
2. He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; he did direct, authorize, or permit the use of information obtained thereby for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; and he did direct the concealment of certain records made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of electronic surveillance.
3. He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, authorized and permitted to be maintained a secret investigative unit within the office of the President, financed in part with money derived from campaign contributions, which unlawfully utilized the resources of the Central Intelligence Agency, engaged in covert and unlawful activities, and attempted to prejudice the constitutional right of an accused to a fair trial.
4. He has failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed by failing to act when he knew or had reason to know that his close subordinates endeavoured to impede and frustrate lawful inquiries by duly constituted executive, judicial and legislative entities concerning the unlawful entry into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee, and the cover-up thereof, and concerning other unlawful activities including those relating to the confirmation of Richard Kleindienst as Attorney General of the United States, the electronic surveillance of private citizens, the break-in into the offices of Dr. Lewis Fielding, and the campaign financing practices of the Committee to Re-elect the President.
5. In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.
In all of this, Richard M. Nixon has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
Wherefore Richard M. Nixon, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

Adopted 28-10 by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

Article 3
In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, contrary to his oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has failed without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives on April 11, 1974, May 15, 1974, May 30, 1974, and June 24, 1974, and willfully disobeyed such subpoenas. The subpoenaed papers and things were deemed necessary by the Committee in order to resolve by direct evidence fundamental, factual questions relating to Presidential direction, knowledge or approval of actions demonstrated by other evidence to be substantial grounds for impeachment of the President. In refusing to produce these papers and things Richard M. Nixon, substituting his judgment as to what materials were necessary for the inquiry, interposed the powers of the Presidency against the the lawful subpoenas of the House of Representatives, thereby assuming to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the sole power of impeachment vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives.
In all of this, Richard M. Nixon has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice, and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
Wherefore, Richard M. Nixon, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.

Adopted 21-17 by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.